Hexadecimal-goomol is equal to \(16^{1,000} = 2^{4,000} \approx 1.318 \cdot 10^{1,204}\).[1] The term was coined by Wikia user Username5243.
ARsygo coined hexadecimal-googolchime for this number.[2]
Decimal expansion[]
Approximations[]
Notation | Lower bound | Upper bound |
---|---|---|
Scientific notation | \(1.318\times10^{1204}\) | \(1.319\times10^{1204}\) |
Arrow notation | \(16\uparrow1000\) | |
Steinhaus-Moser Notation | 453[3] | 454[3] |
Copy notation | 1[1205] | 2[1205] |
Taro's multivariable Ackermann function | A(3,3997) | A(3,3998) |
Pound-Star Notation | #*((1508))*20 | #*((1509))*20 |
BEAF | {16,1000} | |
Hyper-E notation | E[16]1000 | |
Bashicu matrix system | (0)(1)[3] | (0)(1)[4] |
Hyperfactorial array notation | 525! | 526! |
Fast-growing hierarchy | \(f_2(3988)\) | \(f_2(3989)\) |
Hardy hierarchy | \(H_{\omega^2}(3988)\) | \(H_{\omega^2}(3989)\) |
Slow-growing hierarchy | \(g_{\omega^{\omega^23+\omega14+8}}(16)\) |
Sources[]
- ↑ Part 1 - My Large Numbers[dead link]
- ↑ AR Googol - Numbers from Extensible-E Retrieved 2023-05-27.
Megoogol · Meg-Googol · Meg-Doogol · Meg-Kiloogol · Meg-Kil-Googol · Meg-Dukiloogol · Meg-Trukiloogol · Dumegoogol · Dumeg-Googol · Dumeg-Kiloogol · Dumeg-Dukiloogol · Trumegoogol · Trumeg-Kiloogol · Tetrumegoogol · Pentumegoogol · Gigoogol · Gig-Googol · Gig-Kiloogol · Gig-Megoogol · Dugigoogol · Trugigoogol · Teroogol · Duteroogol · Truteroogol · Petoogol · Ectoogol · Zettoogol · Yottoogol · Xennoogol · Wekoogol
Note: The readers should be careful that numbers defined by Username5243's Array Notation are ill-defined as explained in Username5243's Array Notation#Issues. So, when an article refers to a number defined by the notation, it actually refers to an intended value, not an actual value itself (for example, a[c]b = \(a \uparrow^c b\) in arrow notation). In addition, even if the notation is ill-defined, a class category should be based on an intended value when listed, not an actual value itself, as it is not hard to fix all the issues from the original definition, hence it should not be removed.