Another equality found[]
Apparently, this number is equal to googolgoogolduplex, can I merge this article to that article? ARsygo (talk) 05:58, July 23, 2017 (UTC)
- I think merging googolgoogolduplex to this article (the other way around) is a better idea, because googolgoogolplex redirects to googol-stack. You know, for consistency. I'll do the merge later. (If you are going to do the merge yourself, be sure to fix any double redirects.) -- ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 15:03, July 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Wait, the particular name "googoldustack" is not sourced, although it's an obvious extension. However, the name "googolstackstack" is. Maybe we should move this to googolstackstack before performing the merge. Or we could just leave this article there, because googolduplex and googoldubang are in those names, and for consistency, again. -- ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 15:06, July 23, 2017 (UTC)
- Moved this article to Googolstackstack and merged googolgoogolduplex into here. -- ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 11:06, August 3, 2017 (UTC)
possible another name[]
Should I mention that this number could be called "googolloguelogue"? (Actually logue is equivalent to stack) --Nayuta Ito (talk) 10:04, August 5, 2017 (UTC)