FANDOM

Bubby3

aka Matthew

  • I live in Ohio, United States
  • I was born on February 17
  • My occupation is Too young to get a job
  • I am Male
  • Bubby3

    Start with a givern collection of particles, and you can perform steps

    First-order step: Replace each atom with \(10^{80}\) atoms.

    n+1th order step, for \(n \geq 1\), count the number of atoms in the universe, call that number m, and repeat an n-1th order step m times

    Superstep. Count the number of atoms in the universe, call it n, and do an n-th order step on n atoms

    Bigger than G: Do a superstep on the observable universe (10^80 atoms) 64 times.

    Read more >
  • Bubby3

    In Strong Array Notation DAN, it has the idea of n-seperators. Tehy represent the 'level' of a seperator. For example, the grave accent and every seperator containing a double comma is a 1-seperator. 2-seperators are either double commas or seperators directly containing triple-commas. The level of a seperator is defined as follows. Clvl stands for comma level

    Clvl of a comma is 0 and the Clvl of a grave accent is 1 Clvl(,...,) with n commas is n for n > 1

    Clvl({a1A1a2...an-1An-1an}}, where a's are numbers and A's are separators = Max(Max(Clvl(A1),Clvl(A2)...Clvl(An-1),Clvl(An))-1,0). So the comma level of a separator is one less than the comma level of the separator with the highest comma level within that separator, and 0 if the the highes…

    Read more >
  • Bubby3

    I am comparing the pDAN comapring rules and the Nested array notation comparing rules

    Steps 1 and 2 in  BAN  just store entires, and SAN doesn't do that

    Step 1 in SAN just reduces the seperator, and BAN doesn't do that when comapring  seperators.

    Step 2 in SAN just says what the varibles are and BAN does that with words.

    Step 3 in BAN isn't mostly used expect when one or both of the seperators have 1 entry. If one has one entry and the other has multiple entries, it is the same as if their levels were higher. If both of them have 1 entry, the fourth line of that rule corresponds with going to step 4. This serves the purpose of step 3. The nesting level is useless after nested array notation because [1\2] has a higher lever but has a lower nest…

    Read more >
  • Bubby3

    I started to analyze Solidus-Extended Cascading-E Notation here. However, I discovered that the analysis is wrong because I got everything beyond *{#,#,1,2} wrong. Here is a summary of my analysis.

    {#,#,1,2} has level \(\varphi(1,0,0,0)\)

    {#,#+1,1,2} has level \(\varphi(1,0,0,\omega)\)

    &(1) has level \(\varphi(1,0,0,\omega^2)\)

    has level \(\psi(\epsilon_{\Omega+1})\) Read more >
  • Bubby3

    My OCF is A(...) It can be represented as a binary theta-like function, or a unary psi-like function

    \(\psi_{A(0,1+n)}(m)\) in my system is equal to \(\psi_n(m)\), when n is a number.

    A(1+n) corresponds to \(Omega_n\) execpt when n is a psi subscript

    A(1,0) corresponds to the inaccessible cardinal

    A(1+a,b) = I(a,b)

    The reason why this function is so strong is that A(1,0,0) or A(B,0) has level Mahlo cardinal, not I(M,0).

    Analogy: This function is to pDAN as theta function is to EAN.

    Comparison with SAN

    A(1,0) has level {1,,1,,2} or I A(1,1) has level {1,,1,,3} or I(1,0)

    A(2,0) has level {1,,1,,1,,2} or I(2,0)

    A(1,0,0) has level {1{1,,2},,2} or M

    A(1,0,1) has level {1{1,,2},,3} or M2

    A(1,1,0) has level {1{1,,2},,1,,2} or M(1,0)

    A(2,0,0) has level {1{1,,2…

    Read more >

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.