Sorry about the irrelevant clickbait title. This is about what we're going to do with ill-defined people on the wiki. There are two extreme points of view: 0) allow anyone and everyone on the wiki provided that he/she is not a vandal, or 1) ban all people that have not been formally verified as well-defined.

As I see it this wiki is at an 0.2 or so. I would like us to get to 0.8. Specifically, I propose the following:

  • If a person is completely ill-defined and has no redeeming features, such as User:CloudyGirl671, he/she should be banned from the wiki.
  • If a person is ill-defined but has some significance otherwise, such as Cloudy176, John Frazee and Ryan Brooke, he/she should remain on the wiki but:
    • He/she should not appear in Category:User page or Googology Wiki:Links.
    • The user page should state as clearly as possible that he/she is ill-defined and should not include approximations in other people that give her/him the veneer of formality.

-- ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 15:35, September 9, 2015 (UTC)

Ad blocker interference detected!

Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.