10,264 Pages

# TheMostAwesomer

## aka Lightning Reed Starfruit Wrangler

• I live in The Far West
• My occupation is Wrangling Starfruits and zapping plants.
• I am Zombie
• ## W-@ Notation

February 26, 2016 by TheMostAwesomer

W-@, or W-At (or just Wat) is something I've done. CBEAF got too unwieldy for the time being, so I changed over to a new project. W-@ is quite a bit simpler, but still gives decently large numbers anyway.

Level 1 of W-@, or simply W-@ Notation, is defined as follows:

Wn@m = n^^^...^^^n w/ m ^'s (I'm only using ... because I'm bad at the wiki's math system), if n and m are both natural numbers. Level 1 doesn't need any other rules, as this one completely covers them (if n = 1, it always would solve to 1, and if m is 1, it's n^n, both obvious from the rule given). It's essentually {n,n,m} in BEAF.

Level 2 of W-@ is Extended W-@ Notation. It permits an arbitrary amount of @s. The generalized rules for x>2 are...

Wn@^xm (that is, x @s, x is also a…

• ## I have a website

February 8, 2016 by TheMostAwesomer

It's highly in the works, mostly because I'm learning google sites by making this site. Obviously I won't be making any articles based off of what I'm posting on this site (but I will help if any articles are made for some reason).

• ## So I got bored

February 3, 2016 by TheMostAwesomer

And did something absolutely stupid! I defined a thing.

It's the "dipsi" function, Ψψ(n). Simply put, Ψψ(n) is the largest number definable within n standard universes, assuming a "standard universe" has a volume the same as the observable universe, and each symbol takes up 1 planck cube of volume. Note that it is different from RAYO(n * 9.475 * 10^184). Note that this excludes dipsi and higher variants (and anything defined by it or its higher variants), but not anything else similar, like RAYO(n). RAYO(n) and similar are fair game.

But dipsi is beaten by tripsi, which is defined as dipsi nested n times, with n being the n of the innermost dipsi; it's Ψψψ(n). Ψψψ(2) is... decent, to say the least, being Ψψ(Ψψ(2)).

Nesting tripsi the same way…

• ## Hyperfactorials and approximations

January 28, 2016 by TheMostAwesomer

I decided to dabble in hyperfactorials for a change and, well, first off, 5 tetra-factorial is pretty big. Approximately E2.188#(E3.339#4). I approximated this as E3#4#2, although I'm not sure if this is as accurate as is attainable. It's pretty close, though, I think.

I'm also working on approximating 6 tetra-factorial and 7 tetra-factorial. Googologically speaking, tetra-factorials are pretty weak, but pretty interesting, too.